# Execution Backlog_ Founder CRM and Platform Planning **Date:** 2026-04-18 **Status:** Draft **Owner:** Sagnik **Reviewers:** Sayan, Sourik **Scope:** Sequenced founder workstreams for CRM, client graph, imports, infra truth, and documentation convergence **Purpose:** Translate the founder implementation blueprint into an execution-ready planning backlog with ownership, sequencing, and approval gates. **Decision Boundary:** This backlog governs planning deliverables and future implementation preparation. It does not itself authorize coding. ## 1. Purpose This backlog governs the founder-side convergence work required before Project Velocity can move into a clean CRM-centered implementation phase. ## 2. Delivery Principles - reconcile current truth before adding new architecture - define canonical data before building new UI - preserve raw evidence before flattening into operator views - keep Oracle adjacent to CRM, not above it - respect owner boundaries across Founder, Sayan, and Sourik ## 3. Workstream Backlog ### Workstream A: Repo and Sprint truth reconciliation - objective: align all founder planning to the current repo rather than outdated assumptions - tasks: - reconcile Sprint 1 fact table against repo and handoffs - identify stale vs current claims - mark legacy feeders and current owner boundaries - definition of done: - reconciliation matrix completed and usable as a review artifact ### Workstream B: Infra and operator truth - objective: create one founder-safe deployment and routing reference - tasks: - consolidate Linux origin truth - consolidate ingress truth - consolidate Comfy/GPU/NVMe truth - define endpoint ownership matrix - definition of done: - operator can understand the runtime topology without opening multiple older docs ### Workstream C: CRM product architecture - objective: define CRM as a top-level product module - tasks: - define CRM IA - define Oracle adjacency - define contact/account/opportunity/task/import/client-360 surfaces - define reuse strategy for existing Oracle pipeline/detail components - definition of done: - CRM product shell is clear enough for frontend implementation planning ### Workstream D: Canonical domains and root API - objective: define the target persistence and route model - tasks: - define `crm_*`, `intel_*`, `inventory_*`, `oracle_*`, `core_*`, `workflow_*` - map current tables into target domains - define root route families and ownership - definition of done: - DB/root API spec is approval-ready ### Workstream E: Import and stewardship model - objective: define the raw-to-canonical import architecture - tasks: - define CSV-first ingest pipeline - define source profile and mapping manifest model - define AI assistance and approval gates - definition of done: - import adapter and schema blueprint are implementable ### Workstream F: Synthetic data generation prep - objective: prepare a coding-agent swarm brief for realistic synthetic client graphs - tasks: - define canonical data requirements - define property pool and client personas - define deliverable formats - definition of done: - a swarm can generate 250 full synthetic client graphs without further architecture decisions ### Workstream G: Monolithic truth consolidation - objective: create the founder-owned single-reference artifact - tasks: - define chapter order - seed initial chapters - cross-link founder pack documents into the monolith - definition of done: - a new engineer can navigate the product architecture by chapter ## 4. Acceptance Gates ### Gate 1: Current truth locked - reconciliation matrix completed - infra/operator truth completed ### Gate 2: CRM and DB architecture locked - PRD, SRS, blueprint, adapter, and DB spec aligned ### Gate 3: Execution readiness locked - backlog, dependency matrix, and synthetic-data brief completed ### Gate 4: Founder reference locked - monolithic truth artifact created and seeded ## 5. Ownership Model - Founder - CRM - import architecture - client graph - monolithic truth - Sayan - Oracle template DB - inventory and multi-surface implications - admin/control implications - Sourik - runtime route-family and orchestration implications ## 6. Sales Readiness Criteria - contact list and client 360 story is explainable - Oracle’s role relative to CRM is clear - import story is believable for existing CRM users - infra/operator deployment truth is clean enough for buyer confidence ## 7. Risks - route-family sprawl without canonical domains - overloading Oracle with CRM responsibilities - designing a perfect AI graph that operators cannot practically use - under-planning migration from current tables ## 8. Immediate Next Actions - finalize all founder pack documents - review with Sayan and Sourik - lock canonical domain naming - approve the synthetic data brief - use the monolith as the next planning anchor ## 9. Bottom Line The founder backlog is not about adding more product ideas. It is about forcing the existing product into one coherent operating model before more code compounds the inconsistency.